中国拟限制先进AI和芯片出口西方

🇨🇳 wow. China is drafting rules to stop its most advanced AI and chip designs from reaching the West. Regulators at the Ministry of Commerce have asked Alibaba, ByteDance and Zhipu how to keep frontier work home. The talks cover training data leaving the country and whether foreigners can still download model weights. Chinese customers would keep full access, but the raw building blocks would stay inside China. Beijing worries because its top models are open-weight, so anyone can download and run them locally. After Kimi K3, the gap with America has nearly closed, and China now sees itself in front. So it wants the same controls Washington has used against it. The chip side goes further. It would block Qualcomm and TSMC from making advanced chips based on Huawei or Alibaba designs. Another move would stop foreign buyouts of agentic AI startups. That follows Meta's $2B purchase of Manus, which Chinese authorities later forced to unwind. Companies warn the limits could slow their progress and cost China the race. The rules may enter China's next export catalogue, its largest revision in years. The real shift is psychological, because Beijing now guards AI like it once guarded rare earths. Openness was the underdog's strategy, and China no longer sees itself as one.   > **引用原帖 Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai):** > Axios: Trump administration weighs restrictions while businesses move to lower-cost Chinese AI. > Such a move would hand OpenAI and Anthropic near-total control of the market. > American companies are turning more and more to Chinese open-weight models because they work and they’re cheap on the API side. > These open-weight models can be run on private infrastructure, allowing businesses to change models and monitor private business data. > US Security officials are concerned that foreign code, bad training decisions or covert behaviors could threaten users and vital systems. > US Commerce had talked about putting Chinese AI labs on its Entity List, which would make it harder for Americans to get to them without a license. > Officials also talked about rules on liability requirements and public pressure against US businesses using the system. > But those plans were killed by officials who cared about innovation, because they believed that imposing limits on them would harm competition and slow AI development in the United States. > Since then, many vocal critics of the release have left and the stronger Chinese releases have increased national security concerns. > https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2079247285977076211