Claude Opus 5 在 3D 编码测试中超越 Fable 5，价格仅为其三分之四

Claude Opus 5 beat Claude Fable 5 on a hard 3D coding test at 3/4 the price. cool experiments by @thehypedotnews - opus 5 vs. fable 5 vs. gpt 5.6 sol vs. kimi k3 opus 5 produced the best-engineered and most visually convincing Three.js results wondering why anyone would even need a Fable 5 outside of some very specific use cases. Opus 5 beats it on most benchmarks while being exactly half the official price. The @thehypedotnews is a 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns, really like their chill-out radio format. https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2080762663865589760/vid/avc1/1440x1080/ZNOtmZ3bJBwQP0o2.mp4?tag=29 > **引用原帖 thehype. (@thehypedotnews):** > claude opus 5 vs fable 5 vs gpt 5.6 sol vs kimi k3 > @AnthropicAI released claude opus 5 today. per the announcement, it's "a thoughtful and proactive model that comes close to the frontier intelligence of claude fable 5 at half the price." key facts from the release: > • priced at $5/mtok input, $25/mtok output – unchanged from opus 4.8 > • anthropic reports it as state-of-the-art on frontier-bench v0.1 (43.3%), gdpval-aa v2 (1861), arc-agi-3 (30.2%), zapier automationbench (26%) and osworld 2.0 (70.6%) > • per the same release, it stays behind mythos 5 on cybersecurity, and behind fable 5 on parts of agentic coding (deepswe 68.8 vs sol's 72.7, frontiercode 53.4 vs fable's 53.5) > • runs at max thinking effort by default; a fast mode is offered at ~2.5x speed for 2x the price. our runs used the standard setting > our test – 3 prompts, single-file html, @threejs, fully procedural, no assets. each has a small fire button (web audio gunshot + muzzle flash + recoil + ejected brass) and a disassemble toggle that explodes the gun into labelled parts and rebuilds it: > 1. 5.56 m4 carbine – collapsible stock, safe·semi·burst lower, quad-rail with r14–r28 panel numbers, aimpoint red-dot, vertical foregrip, folding bipod, a2 flash hider, breaks into 10 parts > 2. glock 18c – select-fire machine pistol, ported 18c compensator slots, "glock 18c / austria 9x19" roll-marks, extended 33-round mag, field-strips into slide, ported barrel, recoil spring, frame, mag > 3. steyr tmp – ribbed polymer housing, threaded barrel, integral forward vertical foregrip, canted translucent 30-round mag > ran on @aimlapi > results: > - cost > #1 gpt 5.6 sol – $1.26 > #2 kimi k3 – $3.60 > #3 opus 5 – $6.22 > #4 fable 5 – $8.12 > - tokens > #1 gpt 5.6 sol – 36,554 > #2 fable 5 – 120,203 > #3 opus 5 – 137,093 > #4 kimi k3 – 196,596 > - lines of code > #1 opus 5 – 2,738 > #2 gpt 5.6 sol – 2,432 > #3 kimi k3 – 1,907 > #4 fable 5 – 1,764 > - generation time > #1 gpt 5.6 sol – 7.8 min > #2 fable 5 – 23.5 min > #3 opus 5 – 24.8 min > #4 kimi k3 – 93.8 min > observations: > • opus 5 wrote the most code and shipped the best-looking guns – the two go together. 2,738 lines, almost no boilerplate, and it beat fable at 3/4 of fable's price. all 3 models render, all 3 disassemble reliably > • it is the only model that respected the black-on-black problem. its studio env is a narrow overhead strip with a comment explaining why ("narrow + long beats big + square here"), and parts separate by roughness, not colour – slide 0.44, ribs 0.52, grip 0.86. that is why the lighting reads like a product shot > • the steyr ribbing and m4 proportions are the best in the test. the ribs are real half-buried cylinders merged into one geometry, each catching a single specular line – not a bump map. thin barrel, slim quad-rail, correct 84cm scale, all computed from named stations, not eyeballed > • price per 100 shipped lines – gpt sol $0.052, kimi $0.189, opus $0.227, fable $0.460. opus buys frontier-grade detail for half of fable's per-line rate > opus 5's code quality: > upsides: > - it engineers instead of eyeballing. everything is built to real-world scale (m4 = 84cm), the rail teeth sit at the exact 1cm pitch a real picatinny rail uses, and the steyr's ribbing is actual 3d geometry catching a specular line, not a bump texture faking it > - it caught a classic three.js trap the others didn't – the bevel on extruded shapes quietly inflates the silhouette, so it pre-corrected every surface constant so decals and ribs sit flush instead of floating or z-fighting > downside: > - one systemic bug: every left-side engraving renders mirrored. roll-marks, the safe·semi·burst selector, the mag numbers – all reversed. single cause, but it hits all three guns > opus 5 is the strongest engineer in this field – it saw traps the others walked into and reasoned about physics constants, real-world scale, and sequences instead of guessing > follow @thehypedotnews for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns > https://x.com/thehypedotnews/status/2080757148078768504 Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai): check out the 24x7 radio format AI news by @thehypedotnews pretty soothing and nice to listen to the day's AI news. https://t.co/nSakICqBOE