Signal Brief

Artificial Analysis 评测 Kimi K3

Artificial Analysis 发布 Kimi K3 评测,模型在 AI Intelligence Index 上获得 57 分,智力水平接近 Opus 4.8 和 GPT-5.5,但落后于 Fable 5 和 GPT-5.6 Sol。Kimi K3 拥有 2.8T 参数,计划开源权重,将成...

twitter关注列表 Kimi.ai (@Kimi_Moonshot) 发布 2026-07-16 收录 2026-07-17 观察

一句话判断

本文提供了 Kimi K3 在多个代理任务上的具体 Elo 评分和成本对比,显示其开源潜力但成本较高,值得跟踪其开源后的影响。

核心信息

Artificial Analysis 发布 Kimi K3 评测,模型在 AI Intelligence Index 上获得 57 分,智力水平接近 Opus 4.8 和 GPT-5.5,但落后于 Fable 5 和 GPT-5.6 Sol。Kimi K3 拥有 2.8T 参数,计划开源权重,将成为领先的开源模型。在代理任务上,Kimi K3 在 GDPval v2 上 Elo 1668,超过 GLM-5.2、GPT-5.5 和 Opus 4.8,但低于 Fable 5;在 AutomationBench-AA 上排名第一。其成本每任务 $0.94,与 GPT-5.6 Sol 相当,低于 Opus 4.8 但高于开源竞品。

原始内容

Kimi.ai (@Kimi_Moonshot) 转发了 Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys) 的帖子: Kimi K3 scores 57 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Its intelligence is comparable to Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 but remains behind Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. Moonshot AI has expressed plans to release the 2.8T parameter model's weights, which would make it the leading open weights model Key results: ➤ Strong agentic task performance: @Kimi_Moonshot's Kimi K3 reaches an Elo rating of 1668 on GDPval v2. This is a marked improvement over K2.6’s 1190, surpassing GLM-5.2 (1514), GPT-5.5 (1494), and Claude Opus 4.8 (1600). However, it still lags behind Claude Fable 5 (1760). Kimi K3 also scores an impressive 53% and takes the #1 position on AutomationBench-AA, our implementation of Zapier’s Agentic SaaS workflow evaluation. ➤ Second-highest performance on AA-Briefcase (agentic knowledge work): On our private long-horizon knowledge work evaluation, Kimi K3 reaches an overall Elo of 1547, +732 points from Kimi K2.6 and behind only Claude Fable 5. It is well-rounded: its rubric scoring and analytical quality almost reach Claude Fable 5’s scores, while GPT-5.6 Sol continues to outperform other leading models on presentation quality. ➤ Set to lead open weights models once weights are released: Moonshot AI has not yet released the weights but expressed plans to do so. Once available, Kimi K3 would clearly lead other open weights models including GLM-5.2 (51) and DeepSeek v4 Pro (44). However, at 2.8T parameters, it is significantly larger than its open weights peers (eg. GLM-5.2 at 753B params and DeepSeek V4 Pro at 1.6T), as well as the Kimi K2 to K2.6 models (1T params). ➤ Cost per task ($0.94) is similar to GPT-5.6 Sol ($1.04), ~1/2 the price of Opus 4.8 ($1.80) and higher than open weights peers: Moonshot AI’s pricing for K3 is significantly higher than their K2 pricing (K3’s output token price is $15/1M tokens while K2.6 was $4). This positions the model as cheaper on a cost per task basis than Opus 4.8, similar to GPT-5.6 Sol ($1.04) and more expensive than open weights peers, GLM-5.2 ($0.32) and DeepSeek V4 Pro ($0.04) ➤ Improved token efficiency alongside higher intelligence: Kimi K3’s token usage on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index decreased significantly, using 21% fewer output tokens than K2.6. The new model used approximately 132M output tokens to complete all nine evaluations, compared to approximately 166M for K2.6, while achieving higher scores. ➤ Native multimodal capabilities: Kimi K3, like K2.6, is released with native image and text multimodal input. If weights are released, this will position Kimi K3 as one of the leading open weights models with multimodal input capabilities Other model details: Context window: 1M Size: 2.8T total parameters Pricing: The first-party API is priced at $3.00/$15.00 per 1M input/output tokens, with cached input discounted 90% to $0.30 per 1M tokens. Modality: Native multimodal input supports text and images, and the model remains text-only for output. Accessibility: Accessible at launch through Moonshot’s first party API. Model weights are not yet released but Moonshot AI has expressed plans to do so. ![photo](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HNXwpcUaUAAcT8l.jpg)

相关动态

01

Kimi K3 在 SpreadsheetBench 2 上排名第一

Kimi K3 在 SpreadsheetBench 2 基准测试中排名第一,超越 Claude Fable 5,完成 34.8% 的 workflow 任务。该基准测试涉及 321 个专家策划任务,平均每个任务包含 11.8 个工作表和 593.5 个单元格更改,聚焦于完整的电子表格工作簿执行。

twitter关注列表2026-07-18#模型#技术突破#评测
观察
02

Mind Lab 开源长文本强化学习项目

Mind Lab 开源了一个长文本强化学习(RL)项目,支持 2M tokens 的长上下文。相比以往需要数千个 GPU 的 1M 上下文研究,该项目仅需 8 个 GPU 即可完成,大幅降低了超长上下文研究的算力门槛。

twitter关注列表2026-07-17#开源#技术突破#模型
观察
03

Kimi K3非对称竞争分析

Kimi K3在Arena前端/WebDev人类盲测中以1679 Elo排名第一,领先Fable 5(1631)和GPT-5.6 Sol(1618),但在综合智能指数中仅排第四(57.1分),落后Fable 5(59.9)和GPT-5.6 Sol(58.9)。K3定价15美元/百万输出tokens,远低于Fable 5的50美元,并计划7...

twitter关注列表2026-07-18#AI#模型#技术突破
观察
04

开源模型长期网络能力差距缩小至4-7个月

长期网络能力方面,领先开源模型落后闭源前沿从2025年大部分时间的6-10个月缩短至4-7个月。GLM-5.2匹配了约4个月前发布的闭源模型。AI安全研究所的32步“The Last Ones”任务中,GPT-5.6 Sol在10次尝试中完成7次,每次预算1亿token,且性能随推理token增加而提升。

twitter关注列表2026-07-17#模型#技术突破#AI安全
观察
05

BestBlogs 早报 · 07-18

月之暗面发布Kimi K3,2.8万亿参数,896选16的Stable LatentMoE,上下文100万token,接近Fable-5但仍落后最强闭源模型,完整权重7月27日前开源;VentureBeat调查显示54%企业已发生AI代理安全事件;xAI开源Grok Build(84万行Rust代码)并残留上传用户代码痕迹;Cursor评...

twitter关注列表2026-07-17#AI#模型发布#开源
观察